Discrimination is bad for your health – and your kids too

Think about the last time you left the house. Did strangers on the street acknowledge your presence with a smile or avert their glance? Chances are that the answer depended on your age, gender and, of course, your race.

Discrimination is bad for your health – and your kids too

There is no shortage of evidence that racism persists. Despite the fact that science has demonstrated that racial groups are defined by society rather than biology, an individual’s experience from the moment they are born is colored by the color of their skin.

Recently, high-profile incidents have focused attention on how people can be treated differently by authority figures, such as police officers, because of their race. However the majority of discrimination experiences are much more subtle.

In fact, subtle bias may actually be more mentally damaging than overt bias. This is because overt bias can be more easily dismissed as ignorant. However subtle bias is able to “get under the skin” to influence physical health.

Racism affects physical health

In recent years, there has been a growing amount of research highlighting the effects of racial discrimination on not only mental health but also physical health. Discrimination may influence physical health through changes in stress physiology functioning.

As an example, in African-Americans experiencing racism has been associated with higher evening cortisol levels, which are considered unhealthy. Similarly, a study among Hispanic youth found that racism experience was associated with higher cortisol levels across the day.

Cortisol and other hormones in the stress physiology system are important for maintaining immune, reproductive and cardiovascular health. Therefore changes in this system as a result of discrimination experience can adversely affect everything from your body’s ability to fight infection to your ability to become pregnant.

The quantity of evidence supporting the relationship between discrimination and physical health is staggering. And yet discrimination may have even greater impacts than was initially recognized.

Racism can affect health across generations

It is increasingly accepted that a woman’s mental and physical health in pregnancy influences her baby. Maternal health may influence offspring through exposure to hormones in pregnancy.

For example, women with high stress hormones give birth to infants with lower birth weight. Since being born small increases risk for developing poor health in adulthood, factors impacting maternal stress hormones in pregnancy could also affect long term offspring health.

While racial discrimination has well known impacts on adult health, less research has focused on the potential for racial discrimination to influence health in the next generation. However the studies that have been done suggest that there can be very important effects.

For example, racial discrimination has been associated with lower birth weight. One particularly interesting study, reported a decrease in birth weight among children of California women with Arab sounding names in the year following 9/11. The author attributed this finding to an increase in racial discrimination experience among these women.

I recently published an article that evaluated whether racial discrimination influences maternal and offspring stress physiology among a socioeconomically and ethnically diverse sample of women from Auckland, New Zealand. Auckland is an interesting cultural context to explore the effects of discrimination on health because it is very ethnically diverse; 39% of all residents were born overseas.

I tracked women who were in the late stages of their pregnancy. What I found was that women who experienced discrimination had higher evening stress hormone levels in late pregnancy, consistent with a pattern of chronic stress.

When I followed up their infants at six weeks of age, I found that their children had elevated stress response to vaccination. These findings suggest that experience of racial discrimination may actually have biological impacts lasting across generations.

What do we do about it?

Understanding the link between discrimination experience and poor health is an important first step towards raising awareness of this issue. But something obviously needs to be done in order to improve the health and well being of all members of society. Continuing to identify and call out the institutional and interpersonal experiences of discrimination is a necessary first step.

Interventions aimed at increasing social support and ethnic identity will likely increase resilience to discrimination experience. Efforts should not focus solely on these “buffering” interventions, however, as this effectively translates into placing responsibility on the victim rather than on the perpetrators of discrimination.

Tools, such as the implicit bias test, exist to help people identify their own biases that they may be unaware of. Recognizing the potential for subtle bias is necessary before anything can be done to address it.

Story by Zaneta Thayer

Repost from The Conversation US

Read more at Discrimination related news at:

Australian Workplace and Discrimination Representatives
Non Lawyer Workplace Representatives
Hotline No. 1800 333 666
Website: www.awdr.com.au

Fighting discrimination for four decades

Peter Wertheim (left), Stephen Lewis. Photo: Nadine SaacksAFTER leading a multicultural stand against the government’s plans to axe Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act last year, Executive Council of Australian Jewry executive director Peter Wertheim will speak at a conference next month marking 40 years since the establishment of the Act.

Wertheim is one of three Jewish presenters scheduled to appear at the conference organised by the Australian Human Rights Commission.

Over two days, the sessions will look at how the legislation has evolved, what it has achieved, its ongoing role and what legal outcomes have been achieved under it.

Wertheim will address the topic “Freedom and social cohesion: a law that protects both”.

“In contemporary Australia there is widespread acknowledgement that discrimination and vilification that is directed against people because of the colour of their skin or because of their race or national or ethnic origin is morally wrong,” Wertheim said. “It violates the most elementary principles of justice and our sense of a fair go. Because of our own history, the Jewish people understand this all too well.”

Pratt Foundation Research Chair of Jewish Civilisation at Monash University Professor Andrew Markus will speak on the topic “Negotiating change in the immigrant nation: public opinion and the transformation of Australia”.

Markus authored the 2014 report Mapping Social Cohesion for the Scanlon Foundation, in which he reported that five per cent of the population experienced discrimination once a month, with those of non-English speaking backgrounds reporting the highest incidence.

University of Technology, Sydney sociology Professor Andrew Jakubowicz, who is a strong advocate for multiculturalism, rounds out the Jewish contingent.

His topic is “Who are the racists in cyberspace? Understanding how to build communities of race hate and the implications for resilience in target communities”.

Story by GARETH NARUNSKY

Repost from Australian Jewish News

You can read more details on Discrimination at:

Australian Workplace and Discrimination Representatives
Non Lawyer Workplace Representatives
Hotline No. 1800 333 666
Website: www.awdr.com.au